We have increasingly
reactivated earlier involvement in behavioral biology, in part because of
the move toward study designs with dynamic measures in provocative tests
using naturalistic challenges in everyday settings [see Reproductive
ecology page], and partly because of our psychobiological work related
to behavior or psychopathology. The desire is to gain more experience-near
insight into what is going on in people's lives, and how behavior and experience
are organized through biosocial processes in ontogeny. The first step in
this direction was a collaborative prospective study with David Gubernick,
of endocrine changes of expectant fathers nine weeks before and after the
birth. Testosterone, but not prolactin, dropped after the birth and was
associated weakly with degree of involvement in childcare. Then, Catherine
Panter-Brick undertook a study with us, of homeless children in Kathmandu,
described in part in the page on human development. The study design was
strongly influenced by exchange occasioned by Worthman's membership in the
Consortium on the Developmental Psychobiology of Stress. It was the first
in which we deployed extensive serial measures of cortisol, along with heart
rate monitoring and self-report, in an initial attempt to get at individual
reactivity and arousal patterns, and to gauge the impact of experience at
the level of the individual. We found that physical burden is much greater
in village children than any of our urban groups, whereas psychological
load (arousal) was highest in homeless and schoolboys.
Our current work on reactivity has been most advanced by the research
in developmental epidemiology with Duke. This is described in the subsequent
section on mental health; since psychiatric diagnoses are based on behavioral
or affective symptoms, study of their biological and experiential substrates
provides an excellent model for probing the underpinnings of emotion and
conduct in general. Work in our capacity as Psychobiology Core of the
Center includes intensive empirical and conceptual work on reactivity,
or physiologic markers of ability to self-regulate arousal in the face
of cognitive or functional challenge. As useful as the reactivity paradigm
has been, its ontological and ontogenetic status, along with its measurement,
remains murky; these paradigmatic confusions require clarification before
further progress can be made.
Finally, some of the behavioral biology falls within the standard human adaptation paradigm concerning physiologic impact of and accommodation to demands or stressors, including high altitude, lifestyle, or seasonality.
Methods | Publications | Opportunities for Collaboration Last Updated February 20, 1999 |